A study across 18 US universities reveals that about 4% of student athletes who tested positive for COVID-19 from spring 2020 to spring 2021 developed long COVID. The study is published in BMC Infectious Diseases. Researchers based their findings on survey results from 6,923 student athletes in spring 2020 and 7,651 in 2020-2021. In spring 2020, 678 (9.8%) of athletes tested positive for COVID-19, as did 1,943 (25.4%) in the 2020-2021 school year.

Of the student athletes who tested positive for COVID-19, 171 (25.2%) had symptoms in spring 2020, and 1,082 (55.7%) were symptomatic in 2020-2021.

No long COVID among vaccinated athletes

Twenty-nine student athletes (4.3%) in spring 2020 and 71 (3.7%) in 2020-2021 had new or continuing symptoms 4 or more weeks after testing positive for COVID-19. Of the athletes who tested positive, 9 (1.3%) stopped participating in their sport for the rest of the spring 2020 semester, and 14 (0.7%) stopped participating for the rest of the 2020-2021 academic year.

"Our findings indicate that in a young sample population that is especially fit, a significant number of COVID-19 infections can be symptomatic (we found 25.2% to 79.6%, depending on time period) and some people (we found 1.0% to 4.3%, depending on time period) will still experience Long COVID, or symptoms lasting longer than one month," the authors wrote.

Of note, in the 2020-2021 school year, 106 (5.4%) of the 1,943 student athletes who tested positive for COVID-19 had been fully vaccinated against COVID-19 at the time of infection. No long COVID was reported among those athletes.

A study of hospitalized Veterans Affairs (VA) patients found that combination therapy was not associated with decreased mortality for multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter infections, researchers reported yesterday in Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology.

The retrospective cohort study, led by a team of VA researchers, looked at VA patients who were hospitalized with MDR Acinetobacter bacteremia and received antibiotics 2 days prior through 5 days after the culture date from 2012 through 2018. The aim was to assess the impact of antibiotic treatments on in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality and costs.

Insignificant impact

MDR Acinetobacter spp. was identified in 184 patients. Most patients were older (mean age, 67 years), White, non-Hispanic men. The vast majority of cultures identified were A baumannii (90%), while 3% were A lwoffii, and 7% were other Acinetobacter species. Half (50.5%) of the infected patients died in hospital, 44% within 30 days, and 67.9% within 1 year.

Penicillins/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (51.1%) and carbapenems (51.6%) were the most prescribed antibiotics. In unadjusted analysis, extended-spectrum cephalosporins and penicillins/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations were associated with a decreased odds of 30-day mortality, but the effect was insignificant after adjustment (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21 to 1.05 and aOR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.37 to 1.53, respectively). There was no association between combination therapy vs monotherapy and 30-day mortality (aOR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.72 to 3.32).

The results are noteworthy, the authors say, because while the Sanford Guide and the Infectious Diseases Society of America recommend combination therapy (high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam plus an additional agent) for treating severe MDR Acinetobacter infections, the findings add to evidence from prior studies that have found limited improved clinical outcomes with combination therapy.

"Our results provide additional comparative effectiveness demonstrating a lack of benefit to combination therapy given within −2 through +5 days from the culture date," they wrote.

A study of more than 25,000 hospitals encounters found that staying in a hospital bed that previously had a patient with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) was associated with an increased risk of hospital-onset (HO)-CDI, researchers reported today in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

In the study, researchers from Emory University School of Medicine used a real-time location system to track the movement of hospital beds at two academic medical centers from April 2018 to August 2019. They defined patients as being exposed to a potentially contaminated bed if, within the 7 days preceding their HO-CDI diagnosis, they had stayed in a bed that held an occupant with CDI in the previous 90 days. They used multivariable logistics regression to determine whether staying in a contaminated bed was associated with HO-CDI after controlling for time at risk and intensive care unit (ICU) admission.

Strong association with contaminated beds, rooms

Among 25,032 hospital encounters with 18,860 unique patients (51.7% female, 52.9% Black, median age 61 years), the researchers identified 237 cases of HO-CDI. Exposure to a contaminated bed was associated with HO-CDI in unadjusted analyses (odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4 to 2.31) and adjusted analyses (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.0). Even after varying the length of time the researchers assumed the bed would remain contaminated (from 90 days to 60, 30, 14, or 7 days), the association persisted.

The analysis also found that exposure to a contaminated hospital room was associated with HO-CDI in both unadjusted (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.5 to 2.5) and adjusted (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.9) analyses, and that 62% of the relationship between HO-CDI and exposure to a contaminated bed was due to both direct and indirect interaction with a contaminated hospital room.

"New technologies or cleaning and disinfection methods that can better eradicate C. difficile spores from a hospital bed and/or the surrounding healthcare environment may lead to significant reductions in healthcare transmission of C. difficile and decrease rates of HO-CDI," the study authors concluded.

The World Health Organization (WHO) technical advisory group on COVID-19 vaccine composition met last week to review the latest SARS-CoV-2 genetic changes and assess if any vaccine changes are needed, and today the group recommended sticking with the current monovalent XBB.1.5 antigen.

Their advice came with caveats about knowledge gaps about efficacy of the current vaccines, genomic surveillance, and aspects of immune response apart from neutralization antibody titers. The group currently weighs in on vaccine composition twice a year. In its last meeting in May, it recommended use of a monovalent XBB lineage vaccine antigen such as XBB.1.5.

As of December 2, XBB-descendant viruses made up 73% of sequenced viruses and are declining against the backdrop of steadily rising BA.2.86 detections, a group that includes JN.1, that currently make up 17% of samples. Scientists continue to see more evolution in the spike protein of newer XBB and BA.2.86 variants.

Serologic testing on the blood of humans who received the monovalent XBB.1.5 vaccine, with or without prior infection, neutralized XBB lineages, as well as BA.2.86 and JN.1. However, the group emphasized that there are only limited data on cross-neutralization against JN.1.

Though it recommended retaining the current XBB.1.5 vaccine strain, it said other formulations or platforms that prompt robust neutralization antibody responses to currently circulating variants, including XBB and BA.2.86 lineages, can also be considered. And the committee encouraged scientists to collect more data on XBB.1.5 vaccine immune response and clinical endpoints, strengthen surveillance regarding emerging variants, and evaluate new vaccine antigens, especially ones emerging from XBB and BA.2.86 lineages.

Global flu activity continues to rise, led by increases in several Northern Hemisphere countries in North America, Europe, and Asia, the World Health Organization (WHO) said this week in an update that roughly covers the latter half of November.

Influenza A made up 87.8% of positive respiratory samples at national flu labs over the reporting period. And though 81.4% of subtyped influenza A viruses globally were the H3N2 strain, the 2009 H1N1 subtype is dominant in North America, where levels are generally above baseline and at expected levels for this time of year.

Europe's activity is still generally low but on the rise, with four countries reporting widespread flu: Denmark, Norway, Spain, and the United Kingdom, with H3N2 and H1N1 detected at similar levels.

Eastern Asia's flu levels continue to rise, mainly due to activity in South Korea, as well as China, where flu is tracking above expected levels, with detections still rising in the northern provinces. In Western Asia, elevated flu levels continue in a handful of Arabian Peninsula countries, with detections increasing in Qatar.

In Africa, flu positives—mainly H3N2—rose in East Africa, including Ethiopia and Madagascar. And in North Africa, levels rose, mainly due to activity in Egypt.