Our weekly wrap-up of antimicrobial stewardship & antimicrobial resistance scans
Study shows stewardship benefits of ID specialists
Originally published by CIDRAP News Apr 9
A retrospective study of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hospitals found that the presence of an infectious diseases (ID) specialist may facilitate improvements in antibiotic prescribing, US researchers reported today in Clinical Infectious Diseases.
For the study, a team led by researchers from the Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System evaluated antibiotic use among patients admitted to an acute-care bed at 122 VHA hospitals during 2016. They used data from a mandatory antibiotic stewardship survey completed by VHA hospitals to determine which hospitals had access to an ID-trained physician or pharmacist, and which had antibiotic stewardship programs.
They then compared antibiotic use among all patient admissions at ID sites with antibiotic use among patients at non-ID sites. Antibiotic use was quantified as days of therapy (DOT) per days-present, and was categorized based on National Healthcare Safety Network definitions.
Overall, 18 of the 122 hospitals (14.8%) lacked an on-site ID specialist. During 2016, there were 525,451 admissions at the ID hospitals and 23,007 admissions at the non-ID sites. In the adjusted analysis, which accounted for factors such as demographics, individual comorbidities, and severity of illness, the presence of an ID specialist was associated with lower use of broad-spectrum antibiotics (odds ratio [OR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 0.99), higher narrow-spectrum beta-lactam use (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.22 to 1.67), and lower total antibiotic use (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.99).
"Core principles of antibiotic stewardship include selecting narrow-spectrum agents when feasible, using antibiotics only when necessary, and prescribing antibiotics for the shortest effective duration," the authors of the study write. "Based on our findings, it appears that at least some of these principles were more broadly applied to patients at hospitals with ID specialists."
The authors suggest that ID specialists may mediate changes in prescribing not only by recommending use of more narrow-spectrum agents and discontinuation of unnecessary antibiotic therapy, but also by enhancing institutional knowledge of appropriate prescribing and facilitating acquisition of stewardship resources.
Apr 9 Clin Infect Dis abstract
Antibiotics commonly prescribed for viruses in Scottish children
Originally published by CIDRAP News Apr 9
In another study today in Clinical Infectious Diseases, UK and Canadian investigators reported that nearly 14% of the antibiotics prescribed to Scottish children under the age of 5 from 2009 through 2017 were for illness caused by common viruses.
Using population registries, data on positive microbiology tests for viral pathogens, and details on community-dispensed prescriptions for antibiotics, the researchers set out to estimate the proportion of antibiotic prescriptions among children under 5 that were explained by virus circulation. Multiple respiratory pathogens were considered, including respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza, human metapneumovirus (HMPV), rhinovirus, and human parainfluenza (HPIV) types 1 to 4.
Over the study period, 452,877 children received 6,066,492 antibiotic prescriptions, and 41,666 had positive viral respiratory tests before their fifth birthday. The overall antibiotic dispensing rate was 607.9 antibiotics per 1,000 child years.
Clear correlations in the patterns of antibiotic prescribing and circulating respiratory virus burden were observed. An estimated 6.9% of all antibiotics prescribed were for RSV, while 2.4% were attributable to influenza, 2.3% to HMPV, 1.5% to HPIV-1, and 0.6% to HPIV-3. A higher proportion of antibiotic prescriptions were attributed to these viruses among previously healthy children without high-risk conditions, compared with children with chronic conditions. Amoxicillin was the most commonly prescribed antibiotic, representing 61.9% of all antibiotics in the study.
The authors say that future vaccines, particularly an RSV vaccine, could substantially reduce antibiotic prescribing in children. "In the meantime, these results highlight critical targets for improving primary care practice and reducing unnecessary antibiotic use," they write.
Apr 9 Clin Infect Dis abstract
Data reveal resistance common in certain ocular pathogens
Originally published by CIDRAP News Apr 9
Antibiotic resistance and multidrug resistance is common in ocular staphylococcal isolates, particularly among older patients, according to a study today in JAMA Ophthalmology.
Using data from the ongoing Antibiotic Resistance Monitoring in Ocular Microorganisms (ARMOR) study, US researchers looked at clinically relevant isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), Streptococcus pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Haemophilus influenzae cultured from patients with ocular infections from January 2009 through December 2018. They assessed overall antibiotic resistance profiles, concurrent and multidrug resistance, and trends by age of patient and over time.
A total of 6,091 isolates from 6,091 patients were submitted from 88 US sites. Of these, 2,189 were S aureus, 1,765 were CoNS, 590 were S pneumoniae, 767 were P aeruginosa, and 780 were H influenzae. Overall, 765 S aureus (34.9%) and 871 CoNS (49.3%) isolates were methicillin resistant and more likely to be concurrently resistant to macrolides, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides compared with methicillin-susceptible isolates (P < .001 for all). Multidrug resistance was also frequently observed among methicillin-resistant S aureus (577, 75.4%) and CoNS (642, 73.7%) isolates. Antibiotic resistance among S pneumoniae isolates was highest for azithromycin (214, 36.3%), whereas P aeruginosa and H influenzae isolates showed low resistance overall.
Small changes in antibiotic resistance were noted over time (less than 2.5% per year), with decreases in resistance to oxacillin/methicillin and other antibiotics among S aureus isolates, a decrease in ciprofloxacin resistance among CoNS, and an increase in tobramycin resistance among CoNS. Analysis of S aureus and CoNS isolates found an increase in antibiotic resistance with patient age.
The authors say the findings overall align with previous ARMOR reports and retrospective reviews of ocular isolates from US clinical centers.
Apr 9 JAMA Ophthalmol study
Nursing home study finds mixed results for antibiotic time-outs
Originally published by CIDRAP News Apr 7
Despite an increase in the frequency of early discontinuation of broad-spectrum antibiotics, the use of an antibiotic time-out (ATO) in nursing homes in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania had mixed results overall, researchers reported today in Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology.
To evaluate the impact of the ATO intervention, in which antibiotic prescriptions are assessed 48 to 72 hours after initiation, researchers from the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health collected data on 11 nursing homes over 25 months. They looked specifically at the effect of the intervention on the frequency and type of antibiotic change events (ACEs) and the extent to which initial antibiotic choice (broad- or narrow-spectrum) modified observed ACE patterns.
ACEs were categorized as early discontinuation, class modification, or administration modification. Analyses were performed using a difference-in-difference (DiD) approach.
Of 2,647 antibiotic events initiated in study nursing homes (1,498 in intervention facilities, 1,149 in control facilities, 376 (14.2%) were associated with an ACE. The overall proportion of ACEs did not significantly differ between intervention and control nursing homes. Early discontinuation ACEs increased in intervention nursing homes (DiD, 2.5%; P = .01), primarily affecting residents initiated on broad-spectrum antibiotics (DiD, 2.9%; P < .01). But the increase in early-discontinuation ACEs was offset by a reduction in class modification ACEs in intervention nursing homes.
The results are noteworthy because ATOs are one of the few antibiotic stewardship interventions that nursing homes can implement, yet few studies have looked at whether they have utility outside the hospital setting. The authors of the study say more research is needed.
"Although we did not observe the increase in ACEs in intervention nursing homes that we expected, we did find evidence that the ATO intervention did increase the frequency of early discontinuation ACEs," they write. "Consequently, we believe that our results justify further studies designed to isolate the effects of ATO interventions on the postprescriptive decision making by nursing home providers."
Apr 7 Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol abstract
Survey: High use of hospital antifungal stewardship strategies
Originally published by CIDRAP News Apr 7
In another study today in the same journal, the results of a survey show that use of antifungal stewardship strategies is high at hospitals within the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America's (SHEA) Research Network (SRN).
Of the 111 hospitals that received the survey, 45 (41%) responded, and 60% of those hospitals had large, well-established antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs). In 43 hospitals, the ASPs used antifungal stewardship strategies, most commonly prospective audit and feedback (73.3%) led by a pharmacist, followed by prior authorization and restriction (67.4%). Roughly half of responding hospitals reported using education (47.0%) or creating guidelines for invasive fungal infection (IFI) management (51.1%).
Although the authors of the study hypothesized that larger and more well-established ASPs and hospitals caring for transplant patients would be more likely to use antifungal stewardship strategies, they found that there was a subset of respondents from private or community hospitals with small ASPs and no transplant populations, and they did not detect any significant associations among ASP size, ASP duration, presence of transplant populations, and higher likelihood of using antifungal stewardship strategies.
"In conclusion, we found that most hospital ASPs within the SRN have implemented antifungal stewardship strategies, including ASPs in smaller, nonacademic hospitals," the authors write. "Important areas for continued expansion of antifungal stewardship include education and institutional guideline development, implementation of rapid laboratory diagnostics, and surveillance of antifungal use with reporting to the NHSN [National Healthcare Safety Network]."
Apr 7 Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol abstract
Hospital prescribing algorithm shows promise, UK study finds
Originally published by CIDRAP News Apr 6
An algorithm designed to augment antibiotic prescribing in secondary care provided appropriate recommendations that were narrower in spectrum than current clinical practice, UK researchers reported in Clinical Infectious Diseases.
The Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) algorithm was developed using locally sourced data and designed for use in general medical and surgical settings at three London hospitals, with implementation and integration into the hospitals' clinical decision support systems starting in July 2017.
To evaluate the impact of the CBR algorithm on antibiotic prescribing, a team led by researchers with the UK's National Institute for Health Research examined two patient populations—patients with confirmed Escherichia coli bloodstream infections and general ward patients with a range of potential infections—and compared prescribing recommendations made by the CBR algorithm with those made by physicians in clinical practice.
Prescribing recommendations were evaluated using the Antimicrobial Spectrum Index (ASI) and the World Health Organization Essential Medicine List Access, Watch, Reserve classification system. The appropriateness of a prescription was defined as the spectrum of the prescription covering the antibiotic susceptibility profile of the known or most-likely organism.
A total of 224 patients (145 E coli patients and 79 general ward patients) were included in the study. Comparison of prescribing showed that 90% (202 of 224) CBR recommendations were appropriate, compared with 83% (186/224) of physician recommendations (odds ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.392 to 3.936; P = 0.71), with similar results found in the specific analysis of E coli and general ward patients.
The CBR algorithm was associated with a significantly narrower spectrum of antibiotic prescribing, with a median ASI of 6 compared with 8 for physician prescribing. CBR recommendations were also more likely to be classified as Access class antibiotics (110/224, 49%) compared with physician prescriptions (79/224, 35%).
"A CBR algorithm provided antimicrobial recommendations that were in line with physician decisions, but also shifted recommendations towards narrower spectrum antimicrobial prescribing," the authors concluded. "Future work is now underway to explore the impact of integration of CBR with other methods for optimisation of antimicrobial prescribing, including dose optimisation platforms and patient-facing applications."
Apr 4 Clin Infect Dis abstract