Our weekly wrap-up of antimicrobial stewardship & antimicrobial resistance scans
Study finds wide variability in antibiotic use at US children's hospitals
A cross-sectional examination of antibiotic use in US children's hospitals has found that, on any given day, more than a third of hospitalized children are receiving an antibiotic, and 1 in 8 are receiving a broad-spectrum antibiotic, US researchers reported today in Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology.
The study, conducted by researchers from Vanderbilt University Medical Center, looked at antibiotic prescribing at 51 US children's hospitals that participate in the Children's Hospital Association's Pediatric Health Information System. Single-day assessments of antibiotic use among all patients at the hospitals were conducted on May 3, 2017; Aug 2, 2017; Oct 25, 2017; and Jan 31, 2018. The main outcome of interest was receipt of an oral, intravenous, or inhalation antibiotic on the study day.
Of 52,769 total hospitalized children, 19,174 (36.3%) received antibiotics on the study day and 6,575 (12.5%) received broad-spectrum antibiotics. The overall prevalence of antibiotic use varied across hospitals, ranging from 22.3% to 51.9%, and did not appear to be explained by the clinical complexity of patients. Antibiotic use prevalence was 29.2% among medical patients and 47.7% among surgical patients.
Although there was no significant seasonal variation in antibiotic use, regional prevalence varied, ranging from 32.7% in the Midwest to 40.2% in the West (P < .001). Among hospital units, pediatric intensive care unit patients had the highest prevalence of both overall and broad-spectrum antibiotic use, at 58.3% and 26.6%, respectively (P < .001).
The authors of the study say further exploration of the main drivers of inpatient antibiotic use variability could help inform antibiotic stewardship efforts.
Mar 6 Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol abstract
Trial demonstrates effectiveness of highly-resistant TB regimen
Originally published by CIDRAP News Mar 5
The results of the clinical trial that helped pave the way for US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the new tuberculosis drug pretomanid appeared today in the New England Journal of Medicine.
The phase 3 Nix-TB trial, conducted at three sites in South Africa by a team of British, South African, and US researchers from April 2015 through November 2017, evaluated the safety and efficacy of 26 weeks of combined treatment with oral pretomanid, bedaquiline, and linezolid in patients with extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) that was not responsive to treatment. The primary end point was incidence of an unfavorable outcome, defined as treatment failure or relapse during follow-up, at 6 months after the end of treatment.
Of the 109 patients enrolled in the trial, 11 (10%) had an unfavorable outcome and 98 patients (90%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 83% to 95%) had a favorable outcome at 6 months after the end of therapy. Among the 71 patients with XDR-TB, 63 (89%; 95% CI, 79% to 95%) had a favorable outcome, and 35 of 38 MDR-TB patients (92%; 95% CI, 79% to 98%) had a favorable outcome. Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 88 patients (81%) and myelosuppression in 52 patients (48%). Both adverse effects were linked to linezolid.
The FDA approved pretomanid—which was developed by the nonprofit TB Alliance, as part of the three-drug combination for patients with XDR- and MDR-TB—in August 2019. The 6-month regimen is significantly shorter than current treatment regimens for highly drug-resistant TB, which last 18 to 24 months, involve as many as eight drugs, and have low cure rates.
"For both individual patients with tuberculosis and national tuberculosis programs, a shorter duration of treatment that is effective is beneficial," the authors of the study wrote.
A secondary end point of treatment failure at 24 months after end of treatment is currently being measured. The authors note that there has been only one additional relapse among the 47 patients who have reached this point in the study.
Mar 5 N Engl J Med study
Aug 14, 2019, CIDRAP News story "FDA approves new drug for highly resistant tuberculosis"
Study: New urine culture order tied to less testing, antibiotic use
Originally published by CIDRAP News Mar 5
The addition of a new order set for urine cultures at five Texas hospitals was associated with decreases in the number of urine cultures performed and days of antibiotic therapy and substantial financial savings, researchers reported today in Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology.
The study, led by researchers from Baylor College of Medicine, analyzed a newly added order set in the electronic health record at the five hospitals that requires practitioners to choose an indication for the type of urine culture being ordered. The main goal for implementing the new order set was to reduce unnecessary testing and antibiotic treatment in patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria.
The primary outcome was the number of urine cultures performed at the hospitals before and after implementation of the new order set, adjusted for the number of total patient-days. The researchers also assessed antibiotic days of therapy (DOT), catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) rate, and the overall financial impact.
The total number of urine cultures at the five hospitals decreased from 32,598 before the new order set (June 2017 through May 2018) to 20,064 after (July 2018 through June 2019). Adjusted per patient-days, urine cultures decreased from 1,175.8 per 10,000 patient-days to 701.4 after the intervention (a 40.4% reduction). Antibiotic DOT for patients with a urinary tract infection fell from 102.5 to 86.9 per 1,000 patient-days (a 15.2% reduction), the CAUTI rate dropped from 11.5 to 9.3 per 10,000 catheter-days, and the estimated yearly savings following the intervention was $535,181.
The authors note that the results suggest the order set is not always being used correctly and that a follow-up quality improvement study may be warranted.
Mar 5 Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol abstract
Review finds high antibiotic use, resistance on African farms
Originally published by CIDRAP News Mar 5
A meta-analysis of previously published research has found high levels of antibiotic use and resistance in food-producing animals and the environment in Africa, a team of Tanzanian researchers reported in Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control.
The researchers reviewed and analyzed 176 articles published from 2005 through 2018 and found that the percentage of farms using antibiotics ranged from 77.6% in Nigeria to 100% in Tanazania, Cameroon, Zambia, Ghana, and Egypt. In total, 14 different classes of antibiotics were used, mainly tetracyclines, aminoglycosides, and penicillins. The prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli isolates in food-animals ranged from 20% in Nigeria to 100% in South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Tunisia, while the prevalence of MDR E coli in environmental samples ranged from 33.3% in South Africa to 100% in Algeria. Environmental E coli exhibited resistance to 16 different antibiotics.
The review also found that none of the countries studied had documented antibiotic use or antibiotic resistance surveillance programs specific for animals or the environment.
The authors of the study say the high levels of antibiotic use and resistance found in animal production systems in Africa is likely to escalate the already high prevalence of antibiotic resistance on the continent.
"This, coupled with weak regulations and antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems in the region is a great concern to the animals, environment and humans as well," they wrote.
Mar 3 Antimicrob Resist Infect Control study
Study: Inappropriate presurgical antibiotic use common in children
Originally published by CIDRAP News Mar 4
A point-prevalence study of 32 US children's hospitals found that prophylactic (preventive) antibiotics were inappropriately given in 33.0% of pediatric surgical patients. The study, published today in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, was led by members of the SHARPS Collaborative based at Washington University in St. Louis.
The researchers collected chart data from the hospitals' electronic medical records from September 2016 to December 2017, identifying 1,324 children receiving antibiotics (cefazolin, clindamycin, vancomycin, cefoxitin, and piperacillin/tazobactam) for surgical prophylaxis.
Overall, 485 prophylactic antibiotics were classified as inappropriate because of administration longer than 24 hours (n = 387, 79.8%), no indication for prophylaxis (32, 6.6%), and the use of antibiotics that were too broad spectrum (29, 6.0%).
National guidelines give procedure-specific recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis, including drug and dosing, to prevent surgical-site infections. "The 2017 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guideline recommends only a single dose of perioperative prophylaxis for clean and clean-contaminated cases," the authors wrote. "Despite these guidelines, inappropriate surgical prophylaxis use continues to be common."
Inappropriate surgical prophylaxis was highest in otolaryngologic patients (62.7%; 95% CI, 52.6% to 72.1%), cosmetic or reconstructive surgery patients (40.7%; 95% CI, 30.0% to 52.2%), and neurosurgery patients (40.3%; 95% CI, 34.2% to 46.6%).
Of the 485 prescriptions deemed inappropriate, 258 (53.2%) would not have been routinely reviewed by the hospitals' antimicrobial surgical programs, according to the authors. The hospitals' use of inappropriate prophylaxis varied significantly, from 0.0% to 62.8%.
The study likely underestimated the percentages of inappropriate use, considering the new CDC recommendation of no antibiotics for low-risk procedures, the investigators said. They called for more studies to better estimate the inappropriate prophylaxis rate, identify contributing factors, and determine the best ways to optimize prophylactic use of antibiotics.
Mar 4 Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol study
Study: De-escalation rates low in hospitalized pneumonia patients
Originally published by CIDRAP News Mar 4
An analysis of adults with pneumonia at 164 US hospitals has found that less than 15% of those treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics had their coverage de-escalated by day 4, researchers reported today in Clinical Infectious Diseases.
The study, conducted by researchers with Cleveland Clinic and the University of Massachusetts Medical School, aimed to assess de-escalation practices in a cohort of hospitalized pneumonia patients after negative cultures for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
New guidelines from the American Thoracic Society and the Infectious Disease Society of America recommend switching from broad-spectrum to narrower-spectrum antibiotics at 48 hours if microbial cultures do not reveal these multidrug-resistant pathogens and the patient is improving. The researchers wanted to know to what degree hospitals will have to change their practices to adhere to this recommendation.
The study’s primary outcome was de-escalation on hospital day 4. The researchers also looked at the association of de-escalation with all-cause mortality, transfer to an intensive care unit (ICU), length of hospital stay, and costs.
Of the 14,170 pneumonia patients treated with one anti-MRSA and at least one anti-pseudomonal antibiotic from 2010 through 2015, both antibiotics were de-escalated in 1,924 patients (13%) by day 4. Hospital de-escalation rates ranged from 2% to 35% and varied across regions, but de-escalation was more common in large teaching hospitals.
At hospitals in the top quartile of de-escalation, rates of de-escalation were less than 50%—even in patients at lowest risk for death. In propensity-adjusted analysis, patients with de-escalation had lower odds of subsequent transfer to the ICU (adjusted odds ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.79), shorter hospital stays (adjusted ratio of means, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.78), and costs (adjusted ratio of means, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.76).
The authors of the study concluded that, in order to adhere to the new guidelines, physicians will need to substantially change their response to negative cultures for most non-critically ill patients. "Since antibiotics are not benign, and antimicrobial stewardship is an important priority, hospital antibiotic stewardship programs should emphasize de-escalation following negative cultures as an opportunity to reduce exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics, improving both antimicrobial stewardship and medication safety by substitution of lower-toxicity agents," they wrote.
Mar 4 Clin Infect Dis abstract
Stewardship intervention tied to improved prescribing for kids' UTIs
Originally published by CIDRAP News Mar 3
A study conducted in a large healthcare system in Colorado found that a multicomponent intervention was associated with increased use of first-line antibiotics among children with uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs), researchers reported today in Pediatrics.
The intervention at Kaiser Permanente Colorado (KPCO), instituted in April 2017 after a gap analysis identified frequent use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in the treatment of pediatric UTIs, involved several educational and process improvements aimed at key drivers of prescribing practices. In addition to developing new local clinical practice guidelines for pediatric UTIs that recommended the narrow-spectrum antibiotics cephalexin or sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim as initial therapy, KPCO conducted a 2-hour educational session on the new guidelines, added them to a searchable online repository, and added a pediatric UTI algorithm and order set to the electronic health record.
To determine the impact of the intervention on prescribing for pediatric UTIs, KPCO researchers conducted an interrupted time-series analysis to compare prescribing before and after the implementation date (January 2014 to September 2018).
Among the 2,142 outpatient UTIs identified (1,636 pre-intervention and 506 post-intervention), after adjusting for clustering of UTIs within treating clinicians, the analysis found that the proportion of UTIs treated with first-line antibiotics increased from 43.4% pre-intervention to 62.4% post-intervention (P < .0001). Use of cephalexin increased from 28.9% to 53% (P < .0001), while use of the second-line antibiotic cefexime decreased from 17.3% to 2.6% (P < .0001). The changes were sustained for 1 year after the intervention. Researchers also observed a decrease in the average antibiotic treatment duration.
The authors note that the design of the study prevents them from inferring that the intervention caused the change in prescribing, and that it's not possible to determine which components were associated with the improvements.
They conclude, "Despite the limitations inherent in a nonexperimental study design, the methods and interventions developed in the current study may be informative to other learning health systems and other content areas when conducting organization-wide quality improvement initiatives."
Mar 3 Pediatrics abstract
Funding for new drug-resistant malaria treatments announced
Originally published by CIDRAP News Mar 3
The European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP) announced today that it will invest €21.9 million (US $24.5 million) to combat drug-resistant malaria in Africa and address other areas of urgent need in malaria treatment.
The EDCTP grant, awarded to the new PAMAfrica consortium led by the Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV), will support a clinical trial for new combinations of compounds for treating complicated and uncomplicated malaria that fully active against artemisinin-resistant strains. Two other trials will assess a rapid-acting treatment for severe malaria and a new malaria treatment for malnourished babies.
MMV, drug maker Novartis, and other partners will provide an additional €22 million (US $24.6 million) over 5 years.
"Antimalarial drug resistance, originally seen in Southeast Asia, is being reported in Africa and may threaten current treatments," MMV Chief Scientific Officer Timothy Wells, PhD, said in a joint news release from EDCTP, MMV, and Novartis. "It is important to have new therapies that are active against this emerging threat of resistance."
The PAMAfrica consortium includes Novartis and research organizations from Burkina Faso, Gabon, Germany, Mozambique, Spain, and Uganda.
Mar 3 EDCTP, MMV, Novartis news release
Study: Delaying antibiotics OK in mild to moderate bacterial infections
Originally published by CIDRAP News Mar 2
Withholding antibiotic therapy until diagnosis of bacterial infections (ie, 4 to 8 hours) seems acceptable in patients other than those who may have septic shock or bacterial meningitis and may be a sound antibiotic stewardship approach, according to a meta-analysis of 60 studies published in Clinical Microbiology and Infection.
European researchers explored the effect of time to antibiotic initiation on clinical outcomes in patients in emergency departments (EDs) who had bacterial infections of different severities and sources.
Initiating antibiotic treatment quickly—within 3 hours—is considered crucial in patients with severe bacterial infections such as septic shock and meningitis, but the researchers sought to better understand which patients could withstand delayed treatment in order to improve antibiotic stewardship. Many patients in the ED have common community-acquired infections caused by bacteria sensitive to narrow-spectrum antibiotics, the researchers wrote.
"We conclude that the literature supports prompt administration of effective antibiotics for septic shock and meningitis, but there is no clear evidence showing that a delayed start of therapy is associated with worse outcome for less severe infectious syndromes," the investigators said. "This approach promotes the use of ecologically favourable antibiotics in the ED, reducing the risks of side effects and selection of resistance."
The researchers, who found few studies in the literature on mild to moderate infections, called for stronger evidence from prospective clinical trials.
Feb 28 Clin Microbiol Infect abstract
Combo antibiotic for resistant UTIs shows promise in phase 3 trial
Originally published by CIDRAP News Mar 2
French biopharmaceutical company Allecra Therapeutics announced last week that its investigational combination drug Exblifep met the US FDA and European Medicines Agency's pre-specified primary end point and demonstrated superiority over piperacillin-tazobactam in a phase 3 trial of patients who had complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs).
The topline results from the phase 3 ALLIUM trial showed that the overall success of Exblifep in cUTI patients was 79.1%, compared with 58.9% for piperacillin-tazobactam. The primary end point in the randomized trial was a combination of clinical cure and microbiologic eradication. The drug was also well tolerated, with 4.3% of patients reporting adverse events, compared with 3.7% of piperacillin-tazobactam patients.
Exblifep is a combination of the novel beta-lactamase inhibitor enmetazobactam with the fourth-generation cephalosporin cefepime. It's intended for treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
"The superiority demonstrated in the primary endpoint, at test of cure, combined with a comparable safety profile to that of well tolerated and widely used piperacillin-tazobactam support the potential use of cefepime-enmetazobactam as a new empiric and carbapenem- sparing treatment for multi-drug resistant Gram-negative infections," Allecra Chief Medical Officer Patrick Velicitat, MD, said in a company press release.
Feb 25 Allecra Therapeutics press release