A survey of public health experts from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) highlights significant gaps in implementation and enforcement of policies aimed at mitigating antimicrobial resistance (AMR), researchers reported late last week in BMC Public Health.
The Global Survey of Experts on Antimicrobial Resistance (GSEAR), developed by researchers with the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute and University of Basel, was sent to public health experts in 138 LMICs to assess their countries' efforts to address AMR. The main areas covered by the survey were existence of AMR national action plans (NAPs), policies and interventions to restrict the sale and consumption of antibiotics, current antibiotic use, antibiotic prescribing practices, collection and reporting of surveillance data, and AMR awareness.
A total of 352 surveys from 118 LMICs were analyzed. Experts in 67% of the surveyed countries reported a NAP on AMR, 64% reported legislative policies on antimicrobial use, 58% reported national training programs for health professionals, and 10% reported national monitoring systems for antimicrobials. Fifty-one percent of LMICs had specific targeted policies to limit the sale and use of protected or reserve antibiotics. While 72% of LMICs had prescription requirements for accessing antibiotics, getting antibiotics without a prescription was reported to be possible in 74% of LMICs.
Government officials may overestimate policy coverage
When the researchers compared the GSEAR results to the 2020-21 World Health Organization–organized Tripartite AMR Country Self-Assessment Survey (TrACSS), which was completed by government officials in 113 LMICs, they found substantial disagreement. For example, TrACCS results indicated 86% had NAPs and 86% had legislative policies on antimicrobial use.
Based on expert perspectives, there are significant gaps in current policy and implementation efforts to address AMR in LMICs, with a large number of countries falling short of target achievements.
The authors say that while the experts consulted in the GSEAR survey may not always be aware of NAPs and specific policies and programs in their respective countries, the gaps between the GSEAR at TrACSS responses suggests countries may be overestimating their efforts.
"Based on expert perspectives, there are significant gaps in current policy and implementation efforts to address AMR in LMICs, with a large number of countries falling short of target achievements; current policy coverage may be substantially lower than what the TrACSS survey suggests," the authors wrote.