A longitudinal cohort study found that the use of a disinfectant combined with selective preventive antibiotics during cataract surgery may be as effective as routine antibiotics for preventing postoperative endophthalmitis, Dutch researchers reported yesterday in JAMA Ophthalmology.
The study examined incidence data from Rotterdam Eye Hospital (REH), where clinicians since 2016 have adhered to a regimen of preoperative disinfection with 1% povidone combined with intracameral antibiotic prophylaxis only after complicated cataract surgery to prevent endophthalmitis, a serious inflammatory eye condition caused by infection. While the standard regimen for preventing endophthalmitis over the past few decades has been 5% povidone combined with routine intracameral antibiotics (ICA), questions have been raised about widespread use of routine antibiotics in patients undergoing the most performed surgical procedure in the world.
The researchers found that postoperative endophthalmitis incidence after 58,598 cataract procedures conducted at REH from 2016 through 2022 was 0.000, which was the same level found in a literature search of 37 studies examining postoperative endophthalmitis incidence with the standard regimen.
No substantial difference in postoperative endophthalmitis
"The REH data show that a low level of postoperative endophthalmitis was associated with 1% povidone iodine disinfection in combination with selective prophylactic antibiotic use and that postoperative endophthalmitis incidence did not substantially differ from routine antibiotic use," the study authors wrote.
They add that limiting antibiotic prophylaxis to complicated cataract surgery may be preferable to routinely exposing large numbers of patients to prophylactic antibiotics.
An accompanying commentary by French and Australian experts, however, questions whether selective use of ICA could lead to potentially avoidable cases of endophthalmitis in uncomplicated cataract surgery.
"This case series may raise more questions as to whether selective use of ICA might be equally effective when used routinely and that further assessment of this possibility probably would be worthwhile," the authors wrote.